Today at lunch with colleagues1 we were having a very nice, relaxed conversation. At some point somebody mentioned he knew somebody who knew Erdős (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Erd%C5%91s); so I asked him what his Erdős number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erd%C5%91s_number) was, and he said it. Then —I think for the first time— the thought crossed my mind that I also could already have a finite Erdős number. I’ve just found that in fact that’s the case, and has been for several years now.
My Erdős number is2 at most 6. For example:
Oh, the happiness. Another silly badge of honor, one more piece of hacker culture I can brag about.
After computing the number, for some reason I don’t feel as impressed as I thought I would. Not because my number is high, of course: I was expecting that. The point is that I didn’t do anything particular except writing something with Jean-Vincent (which I did before knowing he had a finite Erdős number to begin with, and of course for reasons completely unrelated to Erdős numbers), to gain this little trophy; everything else happened out of my control and out of my knowledge.
Once more I suppose it’s a matter of identity: the category “Erdős number 6” is something determined by others much more than by me, so I don’t feel I rightfully belong to it.
Well, of course if I wanted to lower my Erdős number I could do something: for example I could study a lot of Linear Logic, which is what Marco, Patrick and Christophe do, and write a work with one of them. Since I don’t know much about the topic that would be difficult for me to do now but I don’t think it would be definitely impossible, given enough time: if I had something interesting to write about the topic, I’m sure they would accept to work with me. Otherwise I could try to convince one of them to work on something I do, and write a paper together; also unlikely now, but not necessarily impossible.
But why should I do that, just for lowering the number? It feels pointless, even for somebody like me who is very much into hacker culture. If Erdős numbers are just an idle musing or a way of visualizing the small-world effect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_world_experiment), that’s fine: by all means a very nice idea by whoever first thought of it. But it’s irrelevant for me: it was something which was built around me, when I just happened to be there by chance.
That’s why I think I probably won’t mention Erdős numbers in my résumé.
— Luca Saiu, 2011-09-22 19:41 (last update: 2015-09-15 15:54)
english, identity, myself, research, university
|Next post||Previous post|
Go to the main index...
All post feeds: Atom 1.0, RSS 2.0.
The opinions I express here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the beliefs or policies of my employer, or for that matter of anyone else. In case you felt that the public statement of my thoughts threatened your warm sense of security and your emotional stability, please feel free to leave at any time.
The system does not support user comments and probably never will. Anyway you can contact me by e-mail if you want to discuss some topic with me. I might update my posts if you provide interesting insights.
Copyright © 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 Luca Saiu
Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire page are permitted in any medium without royalties, provided this notice is preserved.
This page was generated by trivialblog. trivialblog is free software, available under the GNU GPL.
Tag icon copyright information is available in this file.
I don’t think there can be anything “confidential” here, but I won’t publish names and specific details without authorization.
As of 2015 it’s down to 4, thru Jacques Sakarovitch.